Review by Steerpike
Developer DICE
Publisher EA
Released November 12, 2008 (Console); Jan 14, 2009 (Windows)
Available for Windows XP/Vista, Xbox 360 (version reviewed), PS3
“While it is innovative, and very courageous, it doesn’t hold that much needed glass up to the rest of videogaming and say ‘see? This is what you look like. Aren’t you ashamed?’ It could have, but it didn’t.”
Change We Can Believe In
I want so bad to believe in Mirror’s Edge, to love it as I hoped it would love me. The idea of the game, the stark, alluring art direction, and the innovative spirit behind the whole mechanic of play; I yearn for them. So Mirror’s Edge came into my home with a substantial advantage over other games: it was one I wanted to like, as though it were a mewing new kitten that’s so adorable you forget you have allergies.
Turns out that those allergies don’t go away just because you want them to, and despite Mirror’s Edge offering so much, grasping for the heavens, it doesn’t quite make it due to what I can only assume is fear on the part of the developers – fear that they’d gone too far, made a game no one would recognize; fear that their work would be pleasing only to them. And in their fear they did things that rational people would not have. They added and removed, they pushed Mirror’s Edge back from the Mirror’s Edge. While it is innovative, and very courageous, it doesn’t hold that much needed glass up to the rest of videogaming and say “see? This is what you look like. Aren’t you ashamed?” It could have, but it didn’t.
Mirror’s Edge is a game about running.
Running like you might have run when you were so small you can’t even understand how or why such an ancient memory remains to you now. Running so fast the wind isn’t caressing but pawing at you, your ears burning and the edges of your vision growing blurry. Running until your head pounds, miserable and delicious at the same time. It’s about jumping and diving and clambering, but doing these things like you MEAN IT, not just like you’re going through the motions. It’s a platformer, but what DICE set out to do with Mirror’s Edge was create a platformer like none other – a truly exhilarating platformer, a world in which you run, and run and run and run and run and that alone is enough to keep you coming back, because in the end, running is freedom, and Mirror’s Edge is also a game about freedom.
The problem is that Mirror’s Edge falls apart when you stop running, and unfortunately, you stop running a lot.
I Like Being a Delta
Swedish developer DICE, best known for the Battlefield series, was very coy with screens and information when Mirror’s Edge was first leaked about a year and a half ago. Just a couple of shots showing a breathtakingly austere cityscape, a place of such brightness and barrenness that it struck a chord in many gamers. Beyond that, all most people knew was that Mirror’s Edge would be a platformer focused more on movement than combat, inspired by the urban jungle-gymery of parkour, and that – contrary to essentially every other platformer in the universe – it would be a first person game.
With Unreal 3.0 technology again showing off its versatility in the visuals department, the discussion turned now to a debate over the wisdom of first-person platforming. First-person is a popular standby, of course, but not for platform games. First person typically denies you body awareness (except in a few rare exceptions, like Thief: Deadly Shadows and Dark Messiah of Might & Magic); you’re generally just a camera floating at head height. And more challenging still is the fact that in a first person game you lack peripheral vision – an imperative in a platformer, a game style that’s all about precise and impeccably timed jumps and balances. Would DICE pull it off?
The answer is yes… sort of. It’s now clear that DICE’s goal with Mirror’s Edge was less to create a first-person platformer and more to build a game where you genuinely feel the momentum of running, the vertigo of heights, the nauseating gastric plunge when you fall, and the dizzying loss of perspective during a roll or tumble. These things DICE manages perfectly, and there’s no doubt that such visceral in-your-faceism of kinetic sensation couldn’t be accomplished in the third person. It just can’t. So instead DICE gave protagonist Faith a body that you can see when you look down. It built in realistic camera sways as she breathes or heaves herself onto a ledge or catwalk. It blurs the edges of her vision as she picks up speed on a run. All that works.
At its most basic level, in Mirror’s Edge your job is to build and maintain momentum. Faith is a “Runner,” a footbound courier employed by underground city factions to transport crucial messages, using the city’s towering skyscrapers as her own thieves highway. She’s part acrobat and part ninja, with a good bit of political boat-rocker thrown in. In the city where she lives, there’s compelling need for people with all three talents.
“The changes came slowly at first,” intones Jules de Jongh, the sadly lifeless actress who voices Faith. Along with this glum narrative are pictures of a city’s transformation, from filthy and vibrant urban melting pot to whitewashed, camera-riddled Stepford fascist utopia. DICE’s art direction for the city is so incredibly severe and bold (it takes courage to use essentially two colors for your game) that you can practically feel the chill sharpness off the place. In this city, since the changes came, all communication and movement is monitored; privacy is simply a sacrifice the people willingly made in exchange for silent, safe prosperity. It is so clean here, so crisp and bright and cold, that you can practically taste the pulsing rot that boils beneath the stark white columns and starched white collars.
Obviously, there are those who resisted the changes, but with every scrap of information collected and examined, the underground depends on primitive methods for communication. This is where the Runners come in, with their stylish yellow messenger bags and their death-defying ability to move through the city unnoticed. They live on the outside, or as Faith says, “between the gloss and the reality.” That is the Mirror’s Edge: the razor sharp line between a totalitarianism so cunningly manufactured that the world welcomes it, and the often uglier and more convoluted but (theoretically) superior human freedom.
Patriotism, Protection, Prosperity
We get a little of Faith’s background in the game, and a little more in some prequel videos released online in the weeks leading up to release. As a troubled office-burglarizing urchin, Faith was taken in by Mercury, the guy who runs the Runners, and trained in the art of flinging herself around a thousand feet from the unforgiving pavement. Soon she’s a Runner herself. transmitting messages between individuals who’d prefer not to have their words scrutinized.
Trouble begins when her sister Kate – whose career has taken quite a different path from Faith’s – is framed for the murder of a political reformer who promised to bring change and freedom more in line with the way the city used to be prior to the current regime. With his death and blood apparently on her sister’s hands, Faith sets off to right wrongs and yadda yadda yadda.
The story is less interesting than the millimeters-below-the-surface political message about the loss of liberty, the monitoring of communication, and the end to privacy, all in the name of “protection of the people.” A very similar thing, of course, took place in the United States during the previous administration, when the Bush government regularly manipulated national fears in order to erode freedoms and concentrate power in a single executive. Given that DICE is Swedish, Mirror’s Edge may be allegorical in the sense that it’s from the outside looking in. That may just be American self-centeredness, of course. It’s quite possible that Mirror’s Edge is just a neutral political commentary and has nothing to do with the U.S. at all.
The way they communicate the changes in the city, aside from Faith’s narrative, is the second most striking and impressive aspect of the game. The city is so bright, so gleamingly clean, with just the odd splash of brilliant color (usually denoting a safe path) here and there. I’ve never seen anything quite like this cold blue and white city, and as much as I know that the game is an argument against fascism, looking at such a beautiful place, and seeing that most of its citizens are perfectly happy, prosperous, and content, kind of makes me wonder whether it’d be so bad to live there.
Unfortunately, the game’s cinematics don’t nearly live up to the stark beauty of the in-game graphics. They’re cel-shaded semi-anime, a style that most resembles a strange hybrid of Peter Chung and Production IG. It’s interesting to look at and would probably make a great animated feature, but the fact is these cinematics look markedly – markedly – worse than the game itself. It’s particularly apparent in the character designs: the cinematics have the Eurasian Faith looking significantly more ethnic, while supporting character Celeste looks like Cruella de Ville; quite a departure from the DA-AMN blonde we encounter in game.
The story Mirror’s Edge tells is short, and not particularly brilliant, despite the experience of writer Rihanna Pratchett. Many of the ideas behind the game are very clever, but unfortunately the script is too dependent on one-liners that miss more often than they hit, annoying character nicknames, and in-your-face politicism without even the barest hint of subtlety. Compared to the space marines we usually get, Mirror’s Edge is practically Pulitzer-worthy, but the truth is, as a political thriller, it couldn’t hold its own against other media.
A Kinder, Gentler Nation
If the graphic design is second, unquestionably the most impressive aspect of Mirror’s Edge is the movement. When you build up a good head of speed on a mission, and you’re vaulting and sliding between obstacles (conveniently illuminated in brilliant red; as a Runner, it’s natural that Faith would see a bridge where you or I would see a crane, and a handhold where we’d see a window sill), man, when it’s like that, this game can’t be beat. It will leave you winded and exhilarated and there’s nothing like it, the sheer joy of momentum and movement, when you’re on a first-name basis with inertia and all the world’s just flying around you like an old paper-track racing game; your vision blurred, your heart pounding, and it’s your playground, and you rule it.
And then you bump into a wall and come to a dead stop and it all deflates like a sad helium balloon left floating too long after the birthday party.
I repeat myself: this game is about building and maintaining momentum. When you’ve got it, it’s sweet. When you lose it, which is far, far too often, it’s just irritating. DICE clearly feared that a platform game without complex platforming would be either too easy or simply boring, so Mirror’s Edge includes some pretty brutal puzzles that demand the best of your observation, timing, and reflexes. So you spend a lot of time not running, and running is all that Mirror’s Edge ought to be about. Well, that and jumping. And sliding.
Other than simply stopping, which breaks the thrill of the game, there’s death. You spend a lot of time dead as Faith, because she falls constantly. Jumps are mercilessly unforgiving, and often you’re expected to pull off moves that would make the Prince of Persia cringe – flipping wall-walks, mid-air twists, timed slides – and you’ve got to stick your landing. It’s irritating, because in many instances you’ll fall dozens of times before you get it right, and you could have spent all that time running.
Combat is another way to die in Mirror’s Edge, against the ubiquitous “blues” that seemingly populate every rooftop of this despotic metropolis. Combat is a pain, especially near the end when there’s a ton of it. Faith’s reflexes can slow time momentarily, and she’s capable of a fair few cool disarming and ass-kicking moves, but all in all first person fisticuffs rarely work. It gets worse when you swipe a firearm from a careless blue and start shooting; amazingly for the creators of Battlefield, gun controls in Mirror’s Edge are oafish and vexing, so most of the time you’re better of using hands and feet – but against guns, that can get tough.
On the subject of controls, Mirror’s Edge innovates. “High” and “Low” actions are handled by the left bumper and trigger respectively, which is darned weird at first. It quickly becomes natural, though, after a few failed attempts at the tutorial and first mission. And unlike Assassin’s Creed’s bizarre new control scheme, of which one reviewer famously said “the controls are brilliant until I really need them to work,” in Mirror’s Edge, the system remains intuitive even during hectic moments like combat.
All in all, Mirror’s Edge would have been better off as an open world, job-board type of game, a gymnastic Autoduel, than it is as a linear mission-based FPP. The yawning expanse of the city conceals the fact that there’s rarely more than one way to get from A to B, and the game’s brevity, coupled with humdrum mission design, mar the experience badly. You also spend a strangely large amount of time indoors, which, while it allows DICE artists to use a color other than white (and use them well, the art direction is universally superb), takes away from the high-flying acrobatics that’re kind of the point of the game.
Reformer with Results
Despite DICE and EA’s fervent conviction that it would sell a blockbusting three million units, Mirror’s Edge has so far moved less than a sixth of that, and it’s viewed as- well, not quite a failure, but certainly not a performer. Reviews have been mixed, and though EA recently announced that a sequel would be developed, the publisher also indicated that there would be changes to core gameplay, meaning Mirror’s Edge 2 is likely to be a third person platformer or a first person shooter. The game annoyingly sets up its own sequel at the end (I hate it when games assume their own success), but the innovative nature of its play is probably over as of now.
Above I said something to the effect that Mirror’s Edge had the opportunity to shine a light on the depthlessness of other videogames through its innovation, and that it failed to do so. I meant that political thrillers – good ones – are rare in the medium, and I hoped Mirror’s Edge would change that. Because the story is only marginally deeper than a standard sci-fi tale and nowhere near as rich as Morrowind or Deus Ex, it did not. I meant that the viscerality of momentum might make developers reconsider ways in which they physically affect the player. Because the momentum stops so often, it did not. I meant its astringent use of color and audacious, stylish art direction might encourage similar experimentation. That one might happen. And I do commend Mirror’s Edge on its outstanding female protagonist, one whose intelligence and physical strength equal her beauty, whose clothing is totally appropriate and whose breasts are not so large as to exert their own gravity.
But despite all it has going for it, Mirror’s Edge never quite reaches the summit of anything. There’s too much frustration and too many instances where the developers clearly backpedaled, going with conventional design wisdom rather than trusting their instincts and producing a game experience that’s truly new. I can understand the fear to some degree; a game where you do nothing but run around sounds pretty risky. But when the running is as psychically refreshing as it is in Mirror’s Edge, that’s a risk they’d have done well to take, and it’s a pity they didn’t, because no one’s likely to get the chance again any time soon.
Minimum System Requirements for PC
Windows XP SP2/Vista; Pentium 4 3.0GHz or equivalent; 1GB RAM; 256MB DX9 video with shader model 3.0; Physx supported with later model nVidia cards
That is an awesome review. It mirror’s my opinion almost exactly. I didn’t mind the puzzle aspect of the game. Taking my time to figure out how to get somewhere is fun at times. I consider the combat to be the games biggest failing. I shouldn’t have had to fought with anyone. Being able to just run past every encounter would have taken away the unnecessary frustration that sets in. I really do hope the developers keep the style and running aspect intact for the sequel.
Thanks, Foshi!
I don’t mind puzzles in platformers either – as you say, taking time to figure one out can be very rewarding. My real complaint in this game is that the puzzles stop you from running, which is so much fun in and of itself. Plus I felt that the puzzles were rather ineptly designed compared to some of the best we’ve seen, a la Sands of Time and some of the good Tomb Raider games.
I also hope the developers are allowed to retain the style of this game in the sequel. DICE is a talented studio that’s willing to try new things; hopefully that will continue.
I see you played the PS3 version of this game, Steerpike, but the graphics grabbed my attention, and seeing as how there’s a PC version, I trotted right on over to look at it on Amazon.
The reviews of the PC version threw me, and now I don’t know if I would buy it. Although I always take these reviews with a huge grain of salt, it looks like, in addition to freeze/crash problems, this game won’t be good for too many go-rounds on GTZ.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00198ZHC8/ref=ord_cart_shr?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance
I actually played the 360 version, Spike, but it’s my understanding the two console versions are identical.
I didn’t realize the PC version had SecuROM, though given that it’s an EA release I should have assumed so. The publisher took so much crap for Spore’s DRM that I suspect they’ll disable it in this one too; perhaps sooner or later publishers will realize that DRM like this does nothing to stop piracy but does plenty to infuriate paying gamers.
You are one great reviewer, Steerpike! In the past, I have been critical of your reviews, but it seems I may have been mistaken.
As I see it, you loved the graphics, thought the controls excellent and intuitive, liked the protagonist (even called her outstanding), although your comment about her breasts was rude and uncalled for. There were other things you mentioned liking. Those things that displeased you…You appeared dissatisfied by the game’s depth and point of view. Hallelujah! It is so good to finally read someone who knows what is really important in gaming…of course, all those aforementioned things are important, but get real…in the absence of a strong, directed, cogent story line, all the rest in pap. Well done’
Gallahad
Man o man, your early paragraphs description of Mirror’s edge really turned me on, tempted me to run right out and buy the thing, but cooler heads prevailed…that is to say, I waited till I finished your review and decided I might prefer to buy Morrow Wind. Without the story, these things are a trial in digit dexterity and/or thumb manipulation.
Excellent review, Steerpike.
Unfortunately, if you could hook up a VU meter to my computer to measure platforming skills, with Pathetic printed in red on the left and Superb in green on the right, I’d more often than not plant the needle deep in the red. Too bad cause this does sound fun but too hard, esp. on a PC. Oh well, the review was plenty of entertainment all on it own.
As for mixing politics with art I have three words of advice for anyone daring to walk that path.
Show. Don’t. Tell.
I still don’t quite understand the common complaint that once the running stops the fun stops. From all the previews and hype the only thing I really wanted was for DICE to implement GOOD first-person movement. Apart from Mirror’s Edge, the only first-person game I can think of that imparts such a visceral, physical sense of place is Thief (not Deadly Shadows, obviously). DICE absolutely nailed the perspective, and so even when the game slows down, the joy of movement remains.
And the other thing reviews constantly complain about is the shooting, which is a little vexing. Faith is not meant to handle guns with agility. But what we do get is DICE’s trademark attention to detail: the guns are LOUD, and satisfying to shoot nonetheless.
Not a bad review overall, but I still feel as though most reviewers are missing some of the game’s strongest points while exacerbating its faults (the story did suck though).
Hi Aja,
Thanks for your comment! Anyone who praises Thief is always welcome at our site.
Let me respond to your remark using your words: I feel as though the developers missed the game’s strongest points, while exacerbating its faults. Mirror’s Edge did the joy of movement brilliantly, and it did prove that first-person platforming is possible. But I can’t agree with your argument that the joy of movement remained even when the running stopped; for me, the game was pure joy when I was in motion and vague irritation any other time. Had the ratio been weighted more toward movement than pauses, I’d have definitely awarded it a higher score.
If the game never stopped it would be exhausting. If the jumps weren’t punishing there’d be no thrill in success. I don’t know how DICE could’ve reconciled this problem, since it’s rather fundamental to their design. It feels like they recognized how powerful an interaction-system they’d created, and wanted to demonstrate how it could function in a variety of settings — be they narrow corridors or wide open rooftops. And I was often grateful for the chance to slow down and enjoy the scenery. Maybe an open-world really would be the best move for a sequel.
Curious you didn’t mention the time trials, though, since they distill the game down to its purest form. And the best part is that once you’ve mastered them you can replay the main game as the perfect acrobat you always wanted to be.
Incidentally, your reviews of Thief are what first led me to this site, and while I’m not exactly a regular reader, I do drop by occasionally to see if you’ve reviewed anything new. I can’t agree with you this time, but our tastes usually seem to align otherwise. So I’ll be waiting for when you get around to Gears 2 😉
[…] equation that much: I tend to play a dude when the option is presented in RPGs, and in games like Mirror’s Edge the protagonist’s gender is well-presented but relegated to second place by the gameplay. […]
[…] creativity, how do their studios manage to churn out innovative and/or successful new IPs like Mirror’s Edge and Dead Space? Oh sure, EA is hardly a saint, but you see a lot more creativity from other […]
[…] translates into “falsifying evidence.” Langdell’s efforts against EA game Mirror’s Edge and other EA titles with the word “edge” in them (I wonder: do sledge or hedge count […]
Mirror’s Edge is *extremely* easy. I cannot understand what frustration you are talking about. Yes, it’s not a Tolstoy’s novel, it’s a short story. For a short story Mirror’s Edge is brilliant.