A recent article on Jezebel got my attention – “Superheroines Always Get Superboobs.” Iris Ophelia quite rightly rails against the limited selection of body types for female avatars in the upcoming new MMO DC Universe Online, which are limited to “tall and busty,” “medium and busty,” and “preteen and busty.”
Where’s “athletic?” Where’s “lean?” Where’s “pear-shaped?”
Admittedly, DCUO is a comic-based MMO and this sort of thing has gone on in comics since forever. But it’s also (mostly) gone on in games since forever, and it’s just getting kind of silly.
Boobs are Yes
The appreciation of the female form is understandable. Actually what I can’t get is why anyone would appreciate the male form. Men are hairy, angular and asymmetrical, have odd-looking stuff dangling off, and sandpaper on their faces. Women, meanwhile, are smooth and pleasantly shaped, with all the geometric symmetry and proportion of lines that men lack. They also generally smell nicer. And doesn’t it seem that the artists of DCUO are actually interfering with proportion in the female body types they’ve created?
Ophelia points out that the male avatars available in the beta aren’t much better – “beefy,” “beefier,” and “preteen” (what is up with that? Preteen again? That scares me a little), and maybe we’ll see some new body types in the release. By “we” I mean “Lewis,” because I’m not an MMOGer. Getting back to the point, though, there is a difference between busty and beefy. Breasts are sexualized; maybe they shouldn’t be but they are. In a happy tree-hippy commune world they’d be symbols of nourishment, of femininity, of procreation. In this world they’re tits, and while this world has made a lot of progress toward de-objectification, you’re a fool if you think we’ve reached the finish line… or maybe even if you think there’s a finish line at all.
Muscles are not sexualized. Athletic bodies tend to be more appealing than bodies that are out of shape, but there are no porn sites devoted to biceps. So the fact that there’s an even number of body types for dudes and chicks doesn’t reduce the issue at hand.
The issue I have is not with breasts. I love those. Boobs are Yes. The issue I have, and I think the issue Ms Ophelia had, is with how they’re presented: the odd, where-did-that-come-from assumption that not just big but immense, anatomically impossible breasts are the ultimate in desirability. These arcing ski-jumps permanently tipped with pencil erasers that seem to stretch out a foot or more from their owners’ thorax, an inch below the collarbone. It’s not the way breasts are attached, people.
It’s the Anatomy, Stupid
While I understand the desire to visit fantasy worlds in video games, worlds where things are idealized and exciting, it’s small-minded to assume that one specific ideal is everyone’s ideal. This is the point in any article about sexism in gaming where the author trots out Alyx Vance, the kickass, completely covered, realistically proportioned heroine from Half-Life 2. To be different, I won’t. No, I will.
Alyx is a character first and foremost, just as real to the player as any of the big-chested superheroines found in DCUO. Alyx is a great character to analyze, but I’ve talked about her character a lot, here and here as well as elsewhere. So today we’ll do what most game designers apparently do; skip discussion of character and focus on her chest. There she is, right over there:
Not exactly as front-loaded as the DCUO characters, is she? And it’s for the best, too, because Alyx spends a lot of time running around at top speed, climbing buildings, and laying flat on her belly when hiding from enemy patrols. Besides that they’re covered completely. Of course, Spider-Woman in this article’s top image is also covered completely, but Alyx is covered in a practical way, while Spider-Woman is covered in a look-at-my-knockers way. Alyx is covered completely by two layers. Probably four, actually; presumably she’s got a tank top or t-shirt and a sports bra on under that Black Mesa hoodie.
So what’s attractive about Alyx? Her beauty, definitely, and her body is a part of that. She is athletic and torqued, strong, lean, tough but feminine. And yet her body is just a part of the equation. Take another look at her. The duct-taped jacket, the grimy bandage on the sprained wrist, the filthy hair. Bearing in mind that Black Mesa went out of business 17 years before Half-Life 2 begins, and the state of humanity when it does, one can imagine how long it’s been since that hoodie was washed. Speaking of washing, there’s no indication Alyx has done it recently either. She spends a good 20 minutes of Half-Life 2: Episode One neck-deep in corpse-strewn sewer water, and she hadn’t exactly been playing in crystalline fountains before that. This is one of those examples where women probably don’t smell nice. But really what makes Alyx Alyx is her attitude and intelligence. Her stupid jokes, her loyalty to The Cause, her friendships with other resistance members, her ability to find something to stay upbeat about at the worst times, her almost catty possessiveness when it comes to Gordon Freeman. Alyx remains one of the most popular and looked-up-to female characters in video games, and so many others still don’t bother to see this when they boobilize the female characters in their games.
I have been present – physically – at game studios when doing consulting work, and sat in on meetings where a developer or publisher rep will look at a piece of concept art and say “make her tits bigger.” I’m not going to name names but it’s happened more than once. We live in a world where anorexic-chic is the new pink but gigantic breasts are expected to be tacked onto these bodies. As issues of Uncanny Valley still threaten the humanization of video games, in our own real world we are presenting a feminine ideal that is as unnatural as it is impossible to attain without surgery and eating disorders. And an entertainment media still perceived as for teenage boys – within and without the industry – caters to that whim with practically every game it produces.
So what about the teenage boys who are gay? Or the ones who simply prefer a different body type? Even “Preteen” (!) in DCUO comes equipped with a monster rack. The popularity of women like Claire Forlani and Kiera Knightley suggest that maybe not everyone finds superboobs as appealing as regular ones.
The makers of DCUO might argue that their very comic-booky universe intentionally adheres to the classic spandex-and-DDs art tradition that has permeated comics forever. But it’s misleading to say that. Some of the greatest comics and graphic novels – the ones that have penetrated cultural awareness well beyond the comics niche – are notably more realistic in their portrayal of superboobs. The art of Pia Guerra (Y: The Last Man), Frank Miller (The Dark Knight Returns), Dave Gibbons (Watchmen), Tony Harris (Ex Machina)… this is work that is decidedly fair and balanced when attaching assets to female characters. Tell me exactly, then, when some of these comics are considered the best in the world (as Half-Life 2 is considered one of the best games), artists and game developers insist on the boobs?
Dismissal of Personality
As someone who strongly believes in fair and equal representation of women in all media, and someone who thinks boobs are great, you’d think I’d be in a tough position here. But the fact is breasts do not make the woman. Alyx – grubby, snarky, terrible sense of humor, small-chested – is far, far more attractive to me than anything that the DCUO character creator seems capable of producing. What I fail to understand is not why game developers don’t feel the same way, but why game developers insist on this one path, this “make her tits bigger” paradigm when it’s been proven that tits won’t sell the game.
Masamune Shirow once said that he made Motoko Kusanagi, the female lead of Ghost in the Shell, a lesbian because he “didn’t want to draw a naked guy’s ass” for a sex scene. Well, fair enough, Shirow. It’s your work, it’s your call. And I suppose for straight dudes with artistic abilities, the fact that they can draw boobs whenever they want them may lead to an almost godlike sense of power. But is it necessary or fair to inflict your own ideal boobic perfection on everyone else? Maybe the rest of the world would prefer more normally proportioned women. After all, women have to deal with pudgy, doughy men who have no proportion at all, yet expect perfect form from Their Women.
Perhaps what the world needs is an all-woman comic company, or an all-woman game developer, committed to portraying men the same way men portray women. A little turnabout might be quite eye-opening. Sheri Graner-Ray, in her wonderful book Gender Inclusive Game Design, noted that it’s not sexually attractive women who are the problem. It’s women who are portrayed as always physically “ready for sex,” which is to say hypersexualized – something men are almost never portrayed as. She compares it to video games containing male characters who sport constant and un-ironic erections. What’s objectifying of women in games and comics is not that attractive women are favored, it’s that they are portrayed exclusively as sexual entities, with rarely any effort put into other aspects of the things that make characters human.
And that’s the key thing. In those meetings where producers say “make her tits bigger,” I have at times wondered aloud why her tits have to be bigger. In fact, at one such meeting, I had the following exchange with a publisher rep whose anonymity I shall protect by calling him “Hildebrand:”
HILDEBRAND: Make her tits bigger.
HILDEBRAND: Because it’s good marketing for the box art.
CONCEPT ARTIST: I can do that. It’s not a problem.
ME: Are we at the box art point yet? This is not a major character anyway.
HILDEBRAND: So why do you care?
ME: I just think that maybe one game out of a thousand should have regular women in it.
HILDEBRAND: So we should just have ugly crones in all our games?
ME: I didn’t say ugly. They can be supermodels. I’m saying that breasts come in a delightful variety of wonderful shapes and sizes.
HILDEBRAND: Look, I appreciate your opinion, but understand that we’re trying to market a game here.
ME: Yes, I understand that. And… you’re paying me to give you my opinions.
HILDEBRAND: Moving on.
On the rare occasions when someone verbalizes a pro-objectification stance, the core of their argument usually matches Hildebrand’s: so you’re saying we should have nothing but ugly crones in games. Which no one is saying. I say “rare occasions” because you’ll find very few people in the industry (on this side of the world, Japan is a whole other article) who will go on record with a “make her tits bigger” philosophy. They’ll say it in production meetings, they’ll support it when others say it, but very few people are going to come along and leave a comment to the effect of “women should be treated as sex objects in games.”
So where does it all leave us? Well, we have to tolerate it. And it’s fair to say that tolerating it isn’t all that hard, though it might be sort of anti-progressive. Nobody’s going to vote with their wallets on this matter and I wouldn’t encourage that they do, unless of course you’re dealing with something genuinely offensive. But it’s sadly ironic that there’s been a lot of recent press about the “new” Lara Croft. What’s the difference between her and the old one? This one is dirty.
No, not like that, I mean dirty, like covered in dirt. And a little banged up, too, it looks like. I suppose at this point, at Tomb Raider 187 or whatever this one is, it’s a bit too late to do anything about her ridiculous breasts, to a token effort has been made. But for titles just getting their start, whether it be DCUO or anything else, it’d sure be nice to see a fairer portrayal. No one’s saying everyone should be ugly. Games are idealized universes we want to lose ourselves in. But developers should remember that not everyone’s idealized universe is the same, and develop accordingly.
Send an email to the author of this post at email@example.com.
To be fair to Lara Croft, the “new” Lara is of far more pracical proportions. Her new character is the Lara that Lara Croft should have always been. If I had any interest whatsoever in the Tomb Raider franchise I’d be pleased with her new direction and style.
As for DC Universe.. I suppose this is just horses for courses, isn’t it? Comic book characters designed in an exaggerated, comic book way? Maybe I’m just giving it a free pass though.
One thing I’ve never understood was the sexualisation of Harley Quinn. I mean was she ever even intended for that purpose? Cat Woman yeah.. but not Quinn I don’t think?
Great piece though, Matt.
Excellent article Matt. Extra points for ‘boobilize’.
Funny you bring this up because I’ve been talking about game boobies with quite a few people recently. Me and Armand were only the other day reminiscing over Tifa’s breasts getting perversely bigger with each cutscene in Final Fantasy VII. By the finale they were colossal.
Then I was explaining to my girlfriend how, after playing Lara Croft and the Guardian of Light with Armand, Lara was still this curvy, bare bellied, busty beauty and hadn’t undergone any sort of ‘realistic’ treatment over the many years she’d been around (this and this were used to illustrate my point). Then Armand pointed me towards the new Lara who is all mucky, sweaty, bloody, bruised and *gasp* modestly proportioned. Talk about timing.
Then I got talking about Alyx Vance in the Cinematic Mod. Bleurgh.
As I’m sure you know, a fair few of us here at Tap have been playing L4D2 over the last couple of weeks (join us!) and one of my first reactions after seeing the spitter and female boomer was ‘My God, realistic — if exaggeratedly grotesque — female figures!’, I mean, check them out, they’ve got rolls of fat and everything. It’s telling that physiques like these get relegated to the safety of the infected zombies rather than the survivors, despite Valve including two black people — one of which is female and the other relatively tubby — in the roster.
“but there are no porn sites devoted to biceps.”
Dude, have you been on the internet? There is a porn site for EVERYTHING! 😀
Excellent write up Steerpike. Despite being mildly disgusted by “Hildbrand,” I imagine that exact conversation has taken place in a million and one video game/comic book/movie development meeting.
I don’t know if the problem is an old guard of men in charge who still think they’re selling a product to male teenagers and virgins, or if they are actually right and this is in fact what the still predominantly male gaming world wants.
A great example is Faith from Mirror’s Edge. They gave her some of the most realistic proportions you would imagine for a woman able to do the wild acrobatic feats she pulls off. A mod was released shortly after the game that allowed you to greatly enlarge her breast size, which far more fans than I like to think about heralded and (thankfully) the developer publicly lamented.
Now I don’t know if these fans were a bunch of teens with messed up concepts of femininity and sexuality (messed up due to video games, magazines, and movies which portray women as such) or if in reality, this really is what the majority of the western world wants.
I often worry that a somewhat minority group of males call for more respectful representations of women, while most still want the ridiculous comic book treatment. I believe they want this in large part because they’ve been told they want it, thus creating an ugly, silicon filled circle of exploitation and sexism.
One final note, the developer of the new Tomb Raider game (and the first one I’m actually kind of interested in) said they’ve done testing on the various Lara’s over the years, where they show video of the character, and use eye tracking software to see what people were looking at as they watched. He explained that in the past, people have predominantly looked at her breasts, but than proudly added that this new Lara is the first time more people focused on her eyes instead. Plus, she wears a LOT more cloths now.
It really seems like they are making more effort than most developers to portray a realistic and more human Lara in this game, and if so, I think we as the gaming public should both financially and vocally support them in their efforts.
Mat said: “One thing I’ve never understood was the sexualisation of Harley Quinn. I mean was she ever even intended for that purpose? Cat Woman yeah.. but not Quinn I don’t think?”
Don’t be dissin’ my girl Harley. 😀
As to whether she was originally intended to be sexualized, I think she was. If you’ve ever watched “Batman: The Animated Series” and listened to the banter between her and the Joker during his birthday you’ll note that she’s very sexual. Not only does she sing to him in the manner of Marilyn Monroe singing to JFK for JFK’s birthday, she also launches into a whole innuendo-filled conversation about pie. (Yes, I do have the entire series on DVD and have met & spoken to one of the artists on the series. What of it? :D) Cat Woman is Bruce/Batman’s “love” interest; why shouldn’t his main nemesis have one as well?
Oddly enough, I’ve never had an issue with the way women were drawn in comic books/graphic novels. It might have to do with having read them as a kid and just accepting it. :shrug: In games, I have to laugh at the women with the “huge tracts of land” because I don’t see how they remain upright in a strong wind nor where they find armour to even fit, let alone swing a sword or fire off an arrow without hurting themselves.
This. “Canaries will go in first”
Steerpike did you check out Harbour Master’s article on Nicolau Chaud’s Marvel Brothel? Be sure to take a look at Chaud’s reaction to Marvel taking his game down as well.
“People also told me that not only I used copyrighted material, but in an offensive way, since I turned Marvel characters into prostitutes. Come on… really? Most female Marvel characters do dress like prostitutes anyway. It isn’t such a stretch of imagination. There is high undeniable erotic content on Marvel characterization.”
Hey Toger, I like Quinn as a character and love the animated series. Fair play on the points you raised, they’re all valid.
Personally though I always thought of Quinn as being abit different to that, rightly or wrongly. I always perceived her character to be abit of a paranoid loner, hanging onto the Joker. There is a love interest there so obviously there is some sexualisation of the character, but I always perceived her character to be more than just the Jokers squeeze. I think what I’m getting at is that I can sort of excuse Wonder Woman or some of the other classic comic book ladies having larger assets, but with Quinn it just looks weird and at odds with how I’ve always thought of her character.
Just my two cents, mind.
““but there are no porn sites devoted to biceps.”
Dude, have you been on the internet? There is a porn site for EVERYTHING! 😀 ”
No, the man’s clearly quite certain about this. I trust him: He’s combed the internet and found that no-one, anywhere, finds gigantic muscles erotic.
Thank you for a well written, well thought-out article that was charming and informative. I really enjoyed it.
Boobs are yes. Diversity is hell yes. Intelligent, mature presentation is always yes-thank-you-more-please.
I just signed up to keep an eye on your musings. Cheers.
Thanks, Brown Fang. And welcome to the site!