It’s a strange feeling knowing you may be made redundant within the next few months. Technically it’s termed “Redeployment”, where those unfit for purpose through a competency based exercise are placed into a “pool” to fight for the odd job or two that crops up. I wouldn’t really refer to it as a pool either, when there are thirty people already swimming in it, with a few dozen more soon to armband up and wade into the shallows. It will need to be Olympic sized for comfort.
And so, in early July I have to submit my application form, consisting of four competencies amounting to no more than 200 words for each, demonstrating my ability. A job 8 months ago I secured (I use that term loosely) against 84 candidates and 4 interviewees. What a poisoned chalice it’s turned out to be.
The odds certainly weren’t in my favour then, and they certainly aren’t now. Several hundred management of my grade are subject to this exercise, with 40 to be made redundant redeployed. I make that 1 in 5, which suggests on my team alone one colleague is going to be saying their goodbyes very shortly.
I’m certainly not averse to the prospect of cut-backs and tightening ones belt. The private sector during the recession was hit hard and fast, with little more than a brown envelope being placed on some poor souls desks indicating you were to pack up, and ship out. In other businesses a meeting was held, X-Factor-style, where if you were unlucky enough to be in the reject room (complete with screams of joy from adjacent rooms) then you knew your time was up and it was time to say your good byes, even before top-brass officials opened their mouths. “I’m coming to get you!”, certainly wasn’t being screamed by Davina McCall. So why should public sector workers be the exception?
Still, there is consolation that the public sector has lasted this long without staff postings facing the axe. We have been insulated for far too long, with an air of divine right for job security creeping out from many quarters. That this exercise within our department shouldn’t even be happening. That no public sector workers should lose their jobs.
It’s certainly not a pleasant exercise, lives will inevitably be ruined, but it is certainly one of necessity.
The chorus of anger towards public sector workers has grown over recent months. Jibes from MPs desperate to make a name for themselves, a new government keen on austerity and wishing to demonstrate restraint, coupled with predictable newspaper hysteria has created a real anger amongst the general public. Stories of senior management on more money than the Prime minister certainly doesn’t aid our defence. £150,000 a year for anyone is more money than most will see in a life time, and is more money than anyone needs to earn, to live a life of luxury.
The head of my department is paid £299,996 pounds per year. Which after tax roughly equates to £14,000 per month. To put this in perspective, the lowest grade in our organisation is paid £14,043 per year. Startling really, when you consider that not only do these early grades provide a fundamental role, but there are so few of them that you would think they cost the earth. But of course, such a head of department will tell you that there simply isn’t the money available within our “affordable structure” to recruit more. Perhaps there would be if the individual took a pay cut of 75%.
What I find incredibly frustrating, is how we are all tarnished with the same brush, that the horror stories of staggering pay are only ever highlighted, instead of the financial struggles the lowest grades face every month. The public sector within the United Kingdom covers almost every aspect of our lives, from dentistry to the National Health Service, social work to dustbin men. It is unfair through averaging salaries, to suggest all public sector workers are paid on or above the national average, when such grossly exorbitant senior management salaries skew the results.
You may also read that our final salary pensions are “gold plated”, that when we retire it will be a life of luxury. To dispel this myth, I pay £65 per month into a premium pension. My latest statement, if I continue to work for the next 40 years at the same grade, continuing to make the same payments (taking account of inflation), shows my final pensionable salary per year will be £14,366 alongside a lump sum. A very respectable wage I might add, considering I will have contributed £31,200 over that same period. Sadly, I’m hardly going to be purchasing a private island any time soon.
And while this figure may be more than many already earn in a year, it is the reason why I chose my job. For the remuneration package in its entirety, and not the net pay at the bottom of my pay slip. If I were to transfer to my local University, at the same grade undertaking a similar role, I would be paid seven thousand pounds more, but receive less flexible working hours and a poorer pension. But the government doesn’t mention any of this when it talks about harsh choices, and fairness for all.
If you were to hand me a clip board, I could happily hand you a list of 200 names, within a hour, of those I have worked with who simply do not deserve to be supported by the public purse. The “I’m-a-civil-servant-they-can’t-sack-me” attitude is all too prevalent within the public sector, where personal and professional accountability is last on long list of priorities, where middle managers entrenched within the organisation have no drive or care for their job or their staff. Long term sickness, flexible working hours and diversity are abused, and are such a drain on our organisation that for this to be rectified would save the business considerable time and money and naturally reduce the need for redundancies.
Watching Dispatches last night, one particular member of the Treasury Committee was verbalising that a civil servant who earns £25,000 per year should have their wage cut by £2,500, followed by an increase in pension contributions of £1,500 per year. An effective cut of £4,000. And while it would certainly save the UK economy several billion pounds, such measures seem not only broad sweeping, but also reckless and would yet again have a catastrophic effect on peoples lives.
I couldn’t help but wonder how much she was paid per year, and how she would feel if I were to slash her pay to £25,000, just to see how should would cope.
At the time of writing, the budget will be announced today within the next ten minutes, and will set out a raft of measures to tackle Britain’s yearly deficit of £155 billion pounds. I worry though, that civil servants are the easy option in an exercise of saving-money-by-numbers. I have already braced myself for far worse cuts than we are currently experiencing.
To digress, there are two sayings that have caused me to develop an odd habit over the last few years, “See a penny, pick it up and all day long you have good look” is the first, and “All good things come in threes.” the second.
When I find three 1 pence coins anywhere, I put them into my wallet and keep them for as long as possible until the luck I need, on a certain occasion has come to fruition. Oddly, three days after discovering I had to re-apply for my job, I found six 1 pence pieces. The week leading up to my job interview, I also found six 1 pence pieces.
Perhaps it’s a sign of better things to come.
Email the author of this post at lewisb@tap-repeatedly.com
Good luck, Lewis.
I work for a university. My salary is available for anyone to see. Matter of fact, it’s reported on an annual basis just so the public can see. Last year, they instituted a sliding scale paycut – across the board – except for the unions who hadn’t yet agreed to it. For months, everyone who was non-represented (that’d be me) bore the brunt of the cut. We were not pleased. The higher-ups were capped at a 10% cut. When you’re pulling down mid to high six figures or more, 10% for the year is probably your entertainment allowance… for a month. Whenever we’re in the news, the backlash about how much money we make and that we’re nothing but overpaid slackers is rampant.
A department I left 5 years ago has done what you’re experiencing: making everyone reapply for their jobs. The department I’m currently working had lay offs a while back. Most in this office survived. It’s insanity.
Good luck buddy, I hope things turn out for the best. If you are forced out, perhaps there is something better a little down the path for you that you otherwise might have missed if you stay where you are.
Best of luck, Lewis. No one should have to justify themselves in such a grueling and humiliating way. It smells of decisions made by incompetents smugly assured of their own jobs. Don’t give up hope.
I have no experience with this sort of “testing”, Lewis but it’s obvious from your article that you are an asset for these guys. If your bosses have even half a brain they will realize how valuable you are to them. You have the big picture and you have the nuances.
Best of luck, mate. I just hope that it’s really based on competencies who they keep and who they let go and not on other stuff such as how hard have you been kissing up to those who make decisions…
But it’s almost shocking to see how much the situation in the UK is similar to where I live. We also have extreme differencies in salary amounts within the public sector and we’re also sacking a shitload of people in the public sector… Personally I work neither public nor private – I am in International Red Cross – and I have barely managed to get a verbal confirmation that my contract will be extended until the end of the year. Of course until I see it signed I won’t know… It’s tough all over it seems…