My schedule over at the IGDA has been a complete mystery. I used to stick very rigidly to a next-month’s-column-is-due-by-the-30th-of-the-previous-and-earlier-if-possible approach, but in the last year it’s been getting harder to do that. Responsibilities pile up and I’m not good at fulfilling them. So it’s nearly the end of April (and entirely my fault), that the April installment of the series is now online. As promised in the previous one, I skip morbid subjects and go for something a little more easy to stomach.
Fun with Franchising
By Matthew Sakey
April 25, 2011
Originally published by the International Game Developers Association
Back when it seemed the Harry Potter movies were switching directors with every installment, I harbored the odd but very genuine hope that Antoine Fuqua would be tapped to helm one. By all accounts he would be an unusual choice but I really felt he’d be able to do something excellent with a Harry Potter movie. Fuqua is an extraordinary talent, and a criminally underrated director. And, really, would he be any stranger a choice than the Four Weddings and a Funeral guy, or the Y Tu Mama Tambien guy? Those two are responsible for far and away the best movies in the series. I think the director of Training Day would have been profoundly right for it.
But directors came and went with no Fuqua in sight until the overlords of the Harry Potter films finally settled on the well-meaning and talented but ultimately unremarkable David Yates. What’s interesting is that despite the fact that each director is hugely different, they all managed to contribute to the whole without losing the thread of stylistic continuity between them. None of the films were truly bad. But some of the Potter directors were better than others, and those who made the best ones were the riskiest choices.
If you want to talk cultural exchange in video games, consider the recent growth of franchise loaning – that is, a studio or publisher with a known franchise handing responsibility for a sequel, expansion, or spinoff to some other developer. In some cases it’s done for actual cultural reasons. With the Japanese market flagging, letting western developers touch traditionally Japanese titles may make them more accessible to western audiences. ENN even invented a delightful term for it: Westwashing.
We talk a lot about the stagnation inherent in over-franchisation of games – you know, Final Fantasy A Million, Call of Guitar Hero 14, what have you. Of course, publishers don’t exist in a vacuum. They over-franchise because gamers buy franchises, and historically new IP is riskier. Recognizing, then, that franchisation is likely to continue, challenging established traditions with new perspectives is a great idea. Let’s hire Antoine Fuqua to direct a Harry Potter film.
So far the results have generally been less than stellar. But I submit that this is more the result of poor collaborator choices rather than being a bad idea to begin with. Metroid: Other M could have – should have – been a masterpiece, and would have been had it not been for Team Ninja, a remarkably inept choice on Nintendo’s part. You don’t give the opportunity for grand feminist character exploration to a T&A factory. GRIN was never the right studio for Bionic Commando, and Slant Six doesn’t seem right for Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City. I have serious doubts about the handling of the new X-COM by 2K Australia, though in that one I really hope I’m wrong.
Collaboration is the future of all industry, including video games. Cultural exchange (and not just human culture – corporate culture, artistic culture, technical culture, that sort of thing) prevents inbreeding and enhances the likelihood of innovation. Of course, you have to choose your collaborators carefully. Because while the above examples represent really bad collaborative decisions, there have also been really good ones. Bethesda chose well when they gave Fallout: New Vegas to Obsidian. Heck, I prefer New Vegas to Bethesda’s own Fallout 3. Irrational did a nice job with SWAT 4 and Tribes Vengeance. Nival delivered us an outstanding Heroes of Might & Magic. Crystal Dynamics temporarily saved Tomb Raider. Blue Castle did well with Dead Rising 2.
The fact is some of the biggest franchises are stuck in deep ruts. Final Fantasy XIII was not a fantastic game. It did not tell a fantastic story. What it did do was stay so slavishly loyal to certain mores of Final Fantasy (while abandoning others) that it got lost in itself. In the wake of that and the disastrous Final Fantasy XIV, I applaud Square for taking the huge risk of letting someone else develop a Final Fantasy game. Had GRIN stayed in business maybe its contribution would have been a much-needed shot in the arm, even possibly forcing Square to reevaluate its approach to the series. I doubt it, because I doubt Square gave GRIN that much leeway, but you never know. And as with Bionic Commando I don’t really see GRIN as the right studio for the job, though I think if Starbreeze or 4A got a crack at the franchise we might see something special.
New angles and viewpoints, while risky, can breathe life into things that have long since stagnated. They can challenge creators to expand beyond their normal boundaries. Moreover, letting someone else take over a project can stave off disaster if the original creators are too close or too careless to be trusted with the franchise. George Lucas had no business having anything to do with the second Star Wars trilogy. If he had done the right thing and challenged, say, Kevin Smith or Catherine Hardwicke (or Antoine Fuqua) to do it, it might have actually been good. The second trilogy needed to be done by someone who had grown up with Star Wars, someone who loved it much more than Lucas ever did. By keeping it to himself he ruined his own work.
You know, JK Rowling wanted Terry Gilliam to direct the Harry Potter movies. Now that would have been an awesome take on the franchise. It probably wouldn’t have been a good move on Warner Bros’ part (Gilliam’s visual genius is eclipsed only by his consistent inability to produce a film on time or within budget), but the movies would have been feasts. Sometimes you can find brilliant collaborators in unexpected places. Double Fine, for example, is the perfect choice for a Sesame Street game. When you think about it, it’s so obvious and so right. Since franchisation is not going anywhere, it seems only logical that franchise owners do what they can to keep things fresh.
Send an email to the author of this post at steerpike@tap-repeatedly.com.
This content appears under the author’s copyright at the International Game Developers Association (IGDA).Views expressed herein are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of the IGDA or its members.
Tap-Repeatedly is not affiliated with the IGDA.
Farst Cawment! Ahem, sorry. I’m not sure a different director would have been enough to save the second Star Wars trilogy. Better script/story (even Neeson, McGregor and Portman couldn’t save it) and some better actors (Christensen, ugh).
But enough about the destruction of my childhood love and point taken. I’ve always liked the idea of people taking on projects outside of their usual or expected ones. Robin Williams in dramatic roles such as Dead Poets’ Society or Good Will Hunting comes to mind as an example of it really working well.
Terry Gilliam and Harry Potter. Now that sounds intriguing. Nih!, I mean Windgardium Leviosa!
Agreed, SB. A director alone couldn’t have saved the scripts as they were written. But a great director who is also a great writer (or teamed with one) could have turned the second trilogy into what we all wanted it to be. Lucas has always been – at best – a careless director; at least in the originals he was smart enough to rely on others for the final two films. His writing may mean well but lacks nuance. He is an idea man, not an execution man. And his lust to show off the fact that he has the biggest computers has now managed to ruin the first trilogy as well.
Robin Williams and Jim Carrey are at their best when not being funny, when challenging themselves. That’s why I seriously wanted to see Fuqua doing Harry Potter. He created in Training Day a world completely real, and yet one that was so far removed from my own (as a pampered upper middle class white man) that every instant I was watching it I felt fear – not fear of African Americans, or fear of gangs, but fear of a world in which nothing in my entire life’s experience would serve me in any way. I would be as lost in that world as a human suddenly transplanted to a totally alien world would be. That’s what made it so scary to me, that he evoked realistically a world that is so often offensively hammed up.
ANYWAY
Had Gilliam been able to responsibly manage the $1B that went into the seven and a half Harry Potter films, the result would have been magnificent. Meanwhile, I would pay honest money to see… say… Remedy do a take on Phantasy Star, or Metroid, or Wizardry. The result might be disastrous but it might be proof of what I believe: collaborate or die.